We are going through one of the rare moments when the great powers all change their policies at the same time. Be careful not to make a mistake: those who miss the train will have to wait for the next one. The re-election of Donald Trump, despite the campaign of almost all Western intellectuals against him, redistributes the cards.
The thunderous declarations of definitive and painful strikes by Iran on Israel and vice versa have proven illusory. We have not witnessed the predicted cataclysm, but a repositioning of the main actors. The men and women who, devoted to the independence of their country, sacrificed everything in Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen must reorganize without the support of their former sponsors.
Donald Trump, ein zweiter Andrew Jackson?
von Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Netzwerk , 19. November 2024
Who knows the history of the Ukrainian "integral nationalists", "Nazis" according to the terminology of the Kremlin? It begins during the First World War, continues during the Second, the Cold War and continues today in modern Ukraine. Many documents have been destroyed and modern Ukraine forbids under penalty of imprisonment to mention their crimes. The fact remains that these people massacred at least four million of their compatriots and conceived the architecture of the Final Solution, that is, the murder of millions of people because of their real or supposed membership in the Jewish or Gypsy communities of Europe.
Everyone has an opinion to explain the massacres committed by the State of Israel in Gaza. While in the 70s and 80s, it was seen as a demonstration of Anglo-Saxon imperialism, many interpret it today as a conflict between Jews and Arabs. Reviewing the long period of history - four centuries -, Thierry Meyssan, a consultant to several governments, analyzes the origins of Zionism, its true ambitions and determines who the enemy is.
We reproduce the text of Thierry Meyssan’s speech in Magdeburg (Germany), at the conference organized by the magazine Compact, "Amitié avec la Russie" , on November 4, 2023. In it, he explains what, in his view, constitutes the fundamental difference between the two conceptions of the world order now clashing from the Donbass to Gaza: that of the Western bloc and that to which the rest of the world refers. The question is not whether this order should be dominated by one power (unipolar) or by a group of powers (multipolar), but whether or not it should respect the sovereignty of each. He draws on the history of international law, as conceived by Tsar Nicholas II and Nobel Peace Prize winner Léon Bourgeois.
